Breaking Domicile – the Gaines-Cooper caseHMRC have won a landmark case. For those who thought that staying in the UK for no more than 91 days per year was sufficient to break domicile – think again. The ruling comes at a time when the HMRC have been making many revisions to what would constitute UK domicile and will surely have an impact on any policy that is subsequently brought out in the coming months. The fact that Robert Gaines-Cooper thought that he was a non-UK domicile as he spent no more then 91 days in any year within the UK, goes to show that more is taken into account than a simple formula on how long you can stay in the country. The ruling has taken into account that he had sufficient ties in the UK which the High Court ruled to be correct and means that Gaines-Cooper is due to pay taxes stretching back to 1976. This presents problems for those who thought that they had broken UK domicile as this will allow the HMRC to pursue thousands of British tax exiles who may have thought that their liability to the UK was no more. The new rules appear to tighten the UK’s grip on those wanting to break domicile with relative ease and make it more clear cut what will constitute a non-dom compared to a domiciled case. For example the new proposed rules state you are not resident in the UK for a tax year if:
The Gaines-Cooper case shows that even meeting these new proposed rules does not necessarily mean that you are safe from the HMRC. This is an area, for all those who have left the UK and are in any doubt of their domicile status, to urgently review. |
